Interview with Joan Saslow and Allen Ascher - authors of the True Colors and Summit books
(From ELT News: The Website for English Teachers in Japan, www.eltnews.com)
Joan Saslow
 |
Joan Saslow has taught English as a Foreign Language and English as a
Second Language to adults and young adults in both South America and the
United States. Ms. Saslow is the series director of Longman's popular five-level
adult series True Colors. She has been an author, an editor of language
teaching materials, a teacher-trainer, and a frequent speaker at gatherings
of EFL and ESL teachers for over thirty years. |
Allen Ascher
 |
Allen Ascher has been a teacher and teacher-trainer in both China and
the United States, as well as an administrator and a publisher. Mr. Ascher
played a key role in the creation of some of the most widely used materials
for adults, including: True Colors, NorthStar, Focus on Grammar, Global
Links, and Ready to Go. He is author of the popular Think about Editing:
A Grammar Editing Guide for ESL Writers.(2003), published by Heinle
& Heinle. |
Their latest co-authorship is titled Top Notch (2005), published by
Pearson Longman. "Top Notch is a dynamic six-level course for international
communication with the flexibility to fit any teaching situation."
Source: Longman.
Joan Saslow and Allen Ascher conducted this interview by e-mail with former
ELT News editor Mark McBennett in December 2005.
ELT: Allen, first to you. You seem to wear many hats: teacher, teacher-trainer,
author, administrator and publisher. You seem to be best known as the author
of Think about Editing: A Grammar Editing Guide for ESL Writers. Can you tell
us a bit about that popular book?
AA: In terms of my many hats, I believe I'm very fortunate to have had
the opportunity to view materials writing from a number of different perspectives,
as well to have met and heard about the experiences of so many teachers around
the world. Think About Editing was written out of my experience teaching writing
to intermediate students. I found (as most teachers do) that, although students
had had previous exposure to key basic grammar points, they still continued
to make errors with that grammar in their writing. The book was designed to
raise their "grammar awareness" so they could self-correct more readily
- an approach I found worked successfully in my classes. It has been very rewarding
to hear from a number of teachers using the text that they have observed significant
results.
ELT: And Joan, you're no slouch either! Your resume includes jobs such as
teacher, teacher-trainer, editor, and public speaker, with your teaching experience
varying from EFL in Chile to workplace English at a General Motors auto assembly
plant in New York. What aspect of your work gives you the most satisfaction?
JS: It may seem strange, but I consider all aspects of my experience
part of the same whole. It's hard for me to separate teaching, teacher-training,
and authorship of textbooks and courses for teachers. Each of my "jobs"
informs the others. In fact, I don't think I would be able to create materials
without having had the experience of teaching and working with teachers who
use my materials and the materials of other authors. Similarly, my work as a
teacher and teacher-trainer is enhanced by my ability to get maximum benefit
from materials. And when I am asked to speak to groups of teachers, I like to
think that the integration of my teaching experience into the authorship of
my published works is the reason I am asked to speak. I hope this is the value
that participants in my workshops derive from them.
ELT: And how did you both come to work together on your new series, Top
Notch?
Answered by Joan for both Allen and Joan: We have worked together as
editors on a variety of projects since 1993, beginning with Longman's Focus
on Grammar series. We next collaborated in the editorial directorship of the
True Colors series. Allen was my editor on Workplace Plus and Literacy Plus,
and through the years we have developed the shared belief that materials need
to be specialized to the needs of learners and teachers in either the "ESL"
or the "EFL settings, not both. In other words, we are convinced the reality
of the EFL setting requires materials specifically dedicated to that reality.
We have always enjoyed working together and, over the years, developed a successful
working relationship based on a shared background, professional and personal
trust, and mutual respect. Our co-authorship of Top Notch grew out of our common
experience of years of teaching English in settings where the classroom was
the only source of input and practice?the "EFL setting"?Allen's in
China, and mine in Chile.
ELT:The publicity for Top Notch says that it "sets a new standard using
the natural language that people really speak" and that it "empowers
and motivates like no other course." Can you elaborate on those claims?
Answered by Joan for both Allen and Joan: That's brochure "advertising-ese"
(and a little embarrassing!) for describing two important aspects of Top Notch:
the use of corpora and the analysis and inclusion of conversation strategies.
As you may know, Top Notch is a corpus-informed course backed by the extensive
database of the Longman Corpus Network and it uses both the Longman Spoken Corpus
as well as the Learners' Corpus of Common Learner errors. In addition, Top Notch
is also based on use of a broader, more informal corpus of spoken and written
language including authentic interviews, real conversations, and authentic texts
to ensure that conversation strategies are well understood and applied. It is
commonly accepted that conversation strategies must be part of a spoken syllabus?strategies
such as ways to keep a conversation going, ways to soften conflict, etc. The
mastery of conversation strategies is one aspect of "empowerment"
(again "advertising-ese"!). We believe building conversation strategies
into practical conversation models for productive manipulation and personalization
provides students the social confidence to communicate with others in a new
language.
ELT:What else distinguishes this series from others of its kind?
Answered by Joan for both Allen and Joan: Both pedagogy and content.
Starting with pedagogy, learners in the EFL setting lack exposure to the English
language and opportunities to practice. In our experience, textbooks don't come
near to providing enough quantity or quality of input, opportunities for practice,
or enough deliberate and varied recycling to make English memorable. Most textbooks
present something on page, say 36, and then that language is never seen again
after page 38! It's impossible to acquire a foreign language without enough
multiple exposures, intensive practice, and systematic recycling to make it
memorable. We wrote Top Notch to provide that to the student and the teacher
in the EFL setting and for that reality because there simply are no materials
that do that.
Considering content, if you look at the content of most published textbook
series, you can see immediately that they are directed to a multi-cultural,
multi-lingual class. The perspective of almost all textbooks is understanding
life in the US or in the UK. However, students in the EFL setting are learning
in mono-cultural, monolingual classes and preparing to use English to communicate
largely with other non-native speakers from a variety of both familiar and unfamiliar
cultures around the world. The fact is that the center of students' English-speaking
worlds is no longer the US or Britain. We designed the content of Top Notch
especially for that student and that student alone, not for the student seeking
to immigrate or live in the US. That's part of what we referred to earlier when
we said our shared belief is that materials should be designed either for the
EFL setting or the ESL setting, not both.
ELT:How much do teachers actually use the companion websites to the series?
Answered by Joan for both Allen and Joan:The Top Notch companion website
has just gone live so we don't have that information, but Longman's other course
companion websites are heavily used because they provide real teaching and learning
support, not just advertising.
ELT:Both of you have taught English to Japanese university students in the
United States. From your experience of teaching students in and from other countries,
do you see any particular qualities that set your Japanese students apart?
Answered by Joan for both Allen and Joan: Most educators agree that
though Japanese students have an extremely good grounding in grammar, they have
difficulty in free oral and written expression. One reason for this is a lack
of exposure to real conversational English. The language and listening material
in communicative courses comes as a bit of a shock when the pedagogy you've
been exposed to is primarily reading and grammar-based. In our experience, Japanese
students are, however, much more confident and successful if they are provided
with activities that give them a lot of support. Merely setting out a topic
for discussion, even if students have learned the vocabulary and grammar necessary
to discuss it, is not enough. Japanese students, perhaps more than others, benefit
from step-by-step language planning activities (such as note- padding, on-the-page
reminders of language already known, surveys, realia, etc.) to help them frame
their ideas and access the language that lies within them. We believe the fault
lies more in the usual pedagogy found in textbooks than in the nationality of
the student. For that reason, we have included in the Top Notch series a set
of discussion practice activities ("Top Notch Interactions") specifically
designed for the student who needs this sort of support.
Without systematic support (such as that provided in activities like the Top
Notch Interactions), many Japanese students are unlikely to participate fully
in class discussions, and therefore will not develop the essential ability to
express themselves freely. Expression, finally, is one of the most important
goals of language study, but without practice, students don't grow. And then
what some may think is a lack of ability becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
We, however, have both had positive results with Japanese students in classroom
discussions. When the pedagogy of the classroom and the textbook provide enough
support, Japanese students are able to speak more fluently, accurately, confidently,
freely, and with greater complexity. Author Marc Helgeson pointed that out in
a panel discussion on the research basis for textbook development at International
TESOL in San Antonio earlier this year. And our own experience with Japanese
students confirms this assertion.
ELT:You've both been in Japan recently. Do you notice any changes in university
English teaching here?
Answered by Joan for both Allen and Joan: Over the years, we've heard
from a number of teachers and administrators that students are entering universities
at a much lower level of English proficiency. The low-beginning learner - or
very weak false-beginner - requires much more language support and opportunities
for controlled practice than in the past. So this led us to begin our series
Top Notch with a Fundamentals level, a highly enriched yet very low level communicative
textbook to provide a thorough grounding in the "fundamentals": fundamental
grammar, social language, conversation strategies, and vocabulary. In our experience,
many "starter level" or "opener" level textbooks assume
too much prior knowledge and ability, so we wanted to create a textbook that
would build confidence while still respecting the adult student who may have
had years of prior study. Key to confidence-building is making sure students
receive multiple exposures to each new language taught, lots of opportunities
for varied practice so they will remember it, and a tremendous amount of recycling.
ELT:Allen, you've taught in China. How do you see the English teaching industry
developing there over the next decade or so?
AA: I was there way back in 1985 through 1987, and at that time English
classes were very "grammar translation." Some language institutes
were just opening up to more communicative methodologies, and I had the opportunity
to observe some phenomenal teachers - but they were the ones who tended to move
overseas to Australia, the US, or the UK, rather than contributing to the profession
in China. In my speaking classes, many students had the same reluctance to speak
that so many Japanese students have. There were, of course, always a few talkative
students who desperately wanted to converse with me, and the easy thing to do
would have been to chat with them and ignore the rest. So they were usually
quite shocked when I continued to insist on class participation by all students.
Everything in China has changed so much since that time, so I'm sure language
teaching has also seen some great leaps forward (if you'll excuse my choice
of words!).
ELT: Joan, last year you gave a plenary entitled, "Irresistible English:
How to Keep Adult Students Coming Back for More." No doubt, many school
owners in Japan would love to hear what you had to say...
JS: Adults face a choice when enrolling in an English course and usually
pay money for their instruction. Making English "irresistible" means
understanding their needs and desires and constructing a course around content
and pedagogy that is highly appealing. We mentioned content and pedagogy earlier,
and we feel that all course and textbook content decisions should be geared
to the real needs of the learner. Adults find relevant, practical content irresistible
and are irritated by boring, irrelevant content. They know well how they will
be using English outside of class. Adults, unlike children, choose to enroll
in English courses. They have limited time. They don't want to be infantilized
or embarrassed by the classroom. Most importantly, they need to see tangible
progress in each class session and need to see progress in each course. For
each class session, students must know what the communication goal is and actually
achieve that goal in a communication activity before leaving class. We have
written lessons with that in mind. When students see progress and learn content
that is relevant to their use of English as an international language, they
re-enroll. Word gets around fast when a school provides that kind of value.
ELT:Thank you both for taking the time to talk with us.

|